America’s founders want the least amount of government possible in order to maintain civil order. Today’s politicians are all about empowering themselves. Time for “we, the people” to take our country back.
Tag: Republican
Megyn v Trump
Guess I’m not the only one who saw it this way.
Democrats Booed God
Never forget, God won’t…
Stand Strong
A word of encouragement to our pastors, who, now more than ever, are on the front lines of the culture war given the assault on marriage and religious liberty.
John Peter Gabriel Muhlenberg, a lesser-known hero of the War for Independence, was a pastor and a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses. In 1775, he preached a sermon on Ecclesiastes 3:1 — “For everything there is a season and a time for every matter under heaven.”
Pastor Muhlenberg closed his sermon with these words:
“In the language of Holy Writ, there is a time for all things. There is a time to preach and a time to fight. And now is the time to fight.”
He then removed his clerical robes and revealed to the congregation that he was wearing the uniform of an officer in the Continental Army.Pastor Muhlenberg’s example of a man of God fighting for our God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness should give increased fervor and devotion most especially to those who lead us in the fight for faith, family and freedom.
Like few times in our nation’s history, this is a time to fight for the values we cherish! — Gary Bauer
If anyone wonders whether the founding fathers thought the federal government should define marriage and not the states, and whether it should interfere with our religious beliefs, here is what Thomas Jefferson thought:
Thomas Jefferson letter to Samuel Miller
Date: January 23, 1808
I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from inter-meddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This results not only from the provision that no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the States the powers not delegated to the United States. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in any religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the States.
It is times like this that we need to strengthen ourselves by reading the book most hated by liberals which was penned by their greatest enemy whom they can never defeat.
1 Peter 1: 19-21 And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
Major Garrett Attacked for Acting like a real journalist
As I have documented in my book, “The Antichrist of Our Time” most of today’s American journalists have either been to the Midwest Academy or have been indoctrinated by professors who received their marching orders from there.
Another way of saying what the CNN reporters were saying as they attacked CBS reporter Major Garrett is, “Major Garrett is failing to march in lockstep with the rest of us, therefore he must be destroyed before he completely unmasks ‘Dear Leader’.”
What happened? The Major asked a legitimate question which any real reporter should be asking. Obama did not like it and our fascistic President got into a hissy-fit over it. Because “Dear Leader” did not like the challenge, many of the sycophantic “journalists” began seeking ways to denigrate Major Garrett in order to curry favor in the eyes of their messiah, Barak Hussein Obama.
If we see Major Garrett being ostracized by his co-workers at CBS we should not be surprised because most of the media has been co-opted by the far left mindset.
Pray, my friends, and keep your powder dry.
–Pastor Ward Clinton
DemoKrats
In June of 1857, the year before he would challenge Illinois Democrat and incumbent Senator Stephen A. Douglas for a seat in the U.S. Senate, Abraham Lincoln addressed the subject of Dred Scott and whether decisions of the Supreme Court should be challenged. Lincoln, was, famously, a lawyer and a good one. He revered the law. And up until the Dred Scott decision, issued by the Court months earlier in March of 1857, Lincoln was unhesitating in his support of judicial decisions. But deliberately, willfully inserting slavery into the Constitution — not based on the law but on the pro-slavery sentiments of the Court’s members, notably including Chief Justice Roger Taney — was a bridge too far for Lincoln. In writing his opinion on the case Taney had quite specifically made his bias plain, saying that African-Americans “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”
Lincoln biographer David Herbert Donald writes of Lincoln’s reaction this way:
“So blatant was the Chief Justice’s misreading of the law, so gross was his distortion of the documents fundamental to American liberty [meaning the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution], that Lincoln’s faith in an impartial, rational judiciary was shaken; never again did he give deference to the rulings of the Supreme Court.”
Not only was Lincoln done with his faith in giving “deference” to the idea of “an impartial, rational judiciary,” he used his speech to tear into Douglas (whom he refers to always as “Judge Douglas” in reference to Douglas’s earlier title as a Justice on the Illinois Supreme Court) for Douglas’s hypocrisy on the issue. In the wake of Dred Scott Douglas was an enthusiastic supporter of the Court’s decision. Lincoln accused Douglas and Chief Justice Taney of, in Herbert’s words, “working, together with other Democrats, to extend and perpetuate slavery.” With the Dred Scott case decided and slavery now, supposedly, enshrined in the Constitution forever, Douglas wanted no one to tamper with it — much less try and undo it.
Read more at http://spectator.org/articles/63293/dred-scotting-religious-liberty
Democrats
Demokrats 3
Wrong is wrong, even if everybody is wrong.
Demokrats 2
Call it the Dred Scotting of religious liberty.
The SCOTUS is making an attempt at writing gay marriage into the Constitution just as once there was a Supreme Court decision that attempted to write slavery into the Constitution. In 1857 the Democrats on the bench deliberately attempted to write the institution of slavery into the Constitution.
The arguments haven’t changed much. Those who were opposed to the SCOTUS ruling then were called “intolerant,” “against the freedom to choose,” and other things similar to what they are today, once again, calling us. The righting of the wrong then was expensive and it may prove expensive once again.
It is time to pray or prepare to pay dearly.
Demokrats
Democrats were the party of slavery then and they are the party of slavery today; only the techniques have changed.
pastorwardclinton 