Abortion

This single juror said, “No. I’m not letting this woman get off with a fake insanity plea. She is not insane. No.” They argued with him. They thought he was arrogant. They showed him their credentials and expected him to say yes, but he wouldn’t. He just kept saying no.

This is our culture: crazy people who will not listen to no and who demand that the rest of us affirm their craziness. It is a crisis of accountability.

For years and years, parents have accepted excuses from their children instead of telling them no and holding them accountable for their actions. For years, pastors have failed to practice discipline, especially as it relates to women. If they ever got up the guts to say no and the women screamed, they would immediately back down.

Part of reclaiming a sane culture is telling people no. No, you don’t get to do whatever you want. No, you don’t get to escape the consequences. No, you don’t get your way just because you scream louder. No. We need much more no in our culture.

If your pet could talk, what would be the first thing it says?

“I love you, poppa.”  That dog has the happiest butt, I’ve ever seen.

Lindsay Clancy Case

That will set such a bad precedent.

Dumbocrat Voters

BLEXIT and come on over to the right side … you’ll love it here.

Lindsay Clancy  Precedent

Rep. Nancy Mace cut straight to the core of a dangerous cultural crossroad. Following the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, the public is left grappling with the horrifying reality that three young, defenseless children were killed, yet legal accountability hung on a single holdout juror. That juror stood their ground, presumably because basic conscience demands that taking the lives of your own children cannot simply be excused away in a court of law.

Justice requires accountability, plain and simple. When biology and mental health struggles are elevated to an absolute shield against criminal responsibility, the legal precedent established is catastrophic. If the legal system formally accepts that hormonal shifts can completely strip a woman of moral agency, self control, and legal culpability, the broader consequences will dismantle generations of progress.

For over a century, women fought tooth and nail to prove they possess the equal capacity to lead, govern, hold executive positions, vote, and command the highest office in the land. The historic argument against women’s equality was always rooted in the archaic claim that biological volatility made women unfit for serious responsibility. Embracing that very premise today validates the oldest, most patronizing anti-equality arguments in modern history.

It is bitterly ironic that this defense emerges in the national spotlight at the very moment a pioneer like Gloria Steinem passes away. Decades spent demanding equal civic standing, intellectual respect, and leadership capability are suddenly threatened by an effort to pathologize the worst imaginable crime into legal innocence. Equal rights cannot exist without equal accountability. When personal responsibility is stripped away under the guise of compassion, women are reduced back to being viewed as legally and emotionally incapable of full citizenship.

That is a win for the muslim ideology claim that women are inferior…Christianity disagrees with that islamist thought