Iran deal destablizes everything

Iran nuke

Islamophobe is a word crafted by Moslem leaders and clerics to be used against non-Moslems in order to silence them. It has also been added to the arsenal of the PC police to silence dissent that could lead to the awakening of the American people who are going about their personal business not really aware of the looming disaster that is stealthily approaching.

“It’s very simple ladies and gentlemen, Alexander the Great had a fantastic quote. And he said I would not fear an army of lions if they were led by sheep, but I would fear an army of sheep if they were to be led by a lion. This great nation is a nation of lions that is currently being led by the greatest of sheep that we have ever seen in our 239 years of existence. How dare Barack Obama, how dare John Kerry, how dare Valerie Jarrett, or any of these other charlatans that occupy Washington D.C., surrender this great constitutional republic to the Republic of Iran.

Ladies and Gentlemen, it was said in December 1775 by Thomas Payne that these are the times that try men’s souls. That the sunshine patriot and the summer soldier will shrink from his duties. But to those who will make a stand – those of you that are here in Times Square – you will deserve the love and admiration of all men and women.

“Ladies and Gentlemen, it’s not over. You being here sends a message that the United States of America, I don’t care who is occupying the White House, we are not surrendering our liberty, our freedom, our way of life.

“I want President Barack Obama to know one thing. You may say that you have done something that no one else has ever done. You know why no one else has ever done it? Because it’s a damn stupid thing that you just did. And if people are upset because of what I’m saying, I really don’t care, because I had a father that stood in WWII. I had an older brother that stood and was wounded at Khe Sanh. I gave 22 years of my life to make sure that that great beacon of liberty, freedom and democracy continues to stand, and I have a nephew, I have friends that are still serving on the front lines. And my commitment is to the oath that I took on 31 July, 1982, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic and to bear true faith and allegiance to the same. It’s not to anybody’s historic event. It’s not for anyone to have some special exhibit in their presidential library. It’s to make sure that the enemies of America and the enemies of Israel are crushed and brought to their knees.

“God bless you all! God bless America! God bless Israel! Thank you.” – Allen West

One man awake awakens another,
The second awakens his next door neighbor,
And three awake can rouse the town,
and turn the whole place upside down.
And many awake can raise such a fuss,
That it finally awakens the rest of us.
One man up with dawn in his eyes – multiplies.

What I say to you, I say to everyone: ‘Watch!’  Mark 13:37

Stand Strong

young uncle sam

A word of encouragement to our pastors, who, now more than ever, are on the front lines of the culture war given the assault on marriage and religious liberty.

John Peter Gabriel Muhlenberg, a lesser-known hero of the War for Independence, was a pastor and a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses. In 1775, he preached a sermon on Ecclesiastes 3:1 — “For everything there is a season and a time for every matter under heaven.”

Pastor Muhlenberg closed his sermon with these words:

“In the language of Holy Writ, there is a time for all things. There is a time to preach and a time to fight. And now is the time to fight.”
He then removed his clerical robes and revealed to the congregation that he was wearing the uniform of an officer in the Continental Army.

Pastor Muhlenberg’s example of a man of God fighting for our God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness should give increased fervor and devotion most especially to those who lead us in the fight for faith, family and freedom.

Like few times in our nation’s history, this is a time to fight for the values we cherish!   — Gary Bauer

If anyone wonders whether the founding fathers thought the federal government should define marriage and not the states, and whether it should interfere with our religious beliefs, here is what Thomas Jefferson thought:

Thomas Jefferson letter to Samuel Miller

Date: January 23, 1808

I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from inter-meddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This results not only from the provision that no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the States the powers not delegated to the United States. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in any religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the States.

It is times like this that we need to strengthen ourselves by reading the book most hated by liberals which was penned by their greatest enemy whom they can never defeat.

1 Peter 1: 19-21  And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

Morals

Every Apocalyptic Environmental Claim is a Full-Fledged Liberal Lie

Rush said that several years ago and it is still true to this very day.

The irresponsible news media screams about drought and El Nino, but “human-caused” global warming has been documented to have ended nearly 21 years ago.  The is why the alarmist have had to keep manipulating the data to try to make it look like AGW was occurring.  It is, always has been, about the money and power; it has never been about “saving the earth.”

Ted Danson assured us in 1988 that the oceans would be devoid of life by 1998.  Various species were supposed to be going extinct everyday. The “rain forest” was supposed to be all gone before the beginning of the 21st century; only problem, it is still thriving.  In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme predicted that climate change would create 50 million climate refugees by 2010.  Hmmm…I wonder if that was the name-change they had planned to instill on “Illegal Immigrants” in order to obfuscate like they did by renaming the “Jungle” to “Rain Forest.”  Everyone tends to think of the jungle as something quite durable while, perhaps, rain forest might be fragile.  However, even with the name change, it has proven to be quite durable, much to the chagrin of the greenies.

Much to the chagrin of the environmental whackos, real scientists keep finding new species as well as thriving population of some of those the greenies declared extinct.  I guess someone forgot to send the memo to the rain forest that it was supposed to stop acting like a jungle and thriving.  Unfortunately, for the seals, polar bear populations are thriving.

Global warming hoax

Back in the seventies, eighties, we had to get rid of Freon even though it was far heavier than air and there was no way for it to get up there where the ozone was at. We had to stop using aerosol spray cans because that heavy compound was creating the hole that really wasn’t there in the ozone. They had maps, they had charts, they showed the us how big the hole was and it was gonna lead to unprecedented levels of skin cancers and it was going to lead to global warming.

Jon Ham at the John Locke Foundation: “The ‘Ozone Hole’ Hoax was ‘Global Warming’ Warm-up act.”   …The Montreal Protocol to ban Freons was the warm-up exercise for the IPCC. Many current IPCC players gained fame then by stampeding the US Congress into supporting the Montreal Protocol. They learned to use dramatized, phony scientific claims … The ozone crusade also had business opportunities for firms like DuPont to market proprietary ‘ozone-friendly’ refrigerants at much [higher] prices than the conventional (and more easily used) Freons…”

A few months ago there were some claims that hundreds of thousands of dead fish were washing up on the beaches of Washington and the fishing industry had been destroyed.  I laughed and laughed when I heard that because I had just returned to the midwest from those beaches where this was supposedly happening and therefore was able to proclaim, from first-hand eyewitness testimony, that no such thing was occurring.  Of course, I got verbally attacked for daring to speak the truth to the doomsday-porn purveyors and other liberal lunatics.  Of course I found it amusing, especially when I was able to say “I’ve got pictures,” and “I can prove the fishing is just fine and all the fish-markets are well-stocked with fresh fish.”

Wake up, everyone

Islamophobe is a word crafted by Moslem leaders and clerics to be used against non-Moslems in order to silence them. It has also been added to the arsenal of the PC police to silence dissent that could lead to the awakening of the American people who are going about their personal business not really aware of the looming disaster that is stealthily approaching.

One man awake awakens another,
The second awakens his next door neighbor,
And three awake can rouse the town,
and turn the whole place upside down.
And many awake can raise such a fuss,
That it finally awakens the rest of us.
One man up with dawn in his eyes – multiplies.

What I say to you, I say to everyone: ‘Watch!’  Mark 13:37

-Pastor Ward Clinton

Major Garrett Attacked for Acting like a real journalist

liberals are stupid

As I have documented in my book, “The Antichrist of Our Time” most of today’s American journalists have either been to the Midwest Academy or have been indoctrinated by professors who received their marching orders from there.

state church

Another way of saying what the CNN reporters were saying as they attacked CBS reporter Major Garrett is, “Major Garrett is failing to march in lockstep with the rest of us, therefore he must be destroyed before he completely unmasks ‘Dear Leader’.”

What happened?  The Major asked a legitimate question which any real reporter should be asking.  Obama did not like it and our fascistic President got into a hissy-fit over it.  Because “Dear Leader” did not like the challenge, many of the sycophantic “journalists” began seeking ways to denigrate Major Garrett in order to curry favor in the eyes of their messiah, Barak Hussein Obama.

If we see Major Garrett being ostracized by his co-workers at CBS we should not be surprised because most of the media has been co-opted by the far left mindset.

Pray, my friends, and keep your powder dry.

prayer2

–Pastor Ward Clinton

DemoKrats

Malcom X

In June of 1857, the year before he would challenge Illinois Democrat and incumbent Senator Stephen A. Douglas for a seat in the U.S. Senate, Abraham Lincoln addressed the subject of Dred Scott and whether decisions of the Supreme Court should be challenged. Lincoln, was, famously, a lawyer and a good one. He revered the law. And up until the Dred Scott decision, issued by the Court months earlier in March of 1857, Lincoln was unhesitating in his support of judicial decisions. But deliberately, willfully inserting slavery into the Constitution — not based on the law but on the pro-slavery sentiments of the Court’s members, notably including Chief Justice Roger Taney — was a bridge too far for Lincoln. In writing his opinion on the case Taney had quite specifically made his bias plain, saying that African-Americans “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

Lincoln biographer David Herbert Donald writes of Lincoln’s reaction this way:

“So blatant was the Chief Justice’s misreading of the law, so gross was his distortion of the documents fundamental to American liberty [meaning the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution], that Lincoln’s faith in an impartial, rational judiciary was shaken; never again did he give deference to the rulings of the Supreme Court.”

Not only was Lincoln done with his faith in giving “deference” to the idea of “an impartial, rational judiciary,” he used his speech to tear into Douglas (whom he refers to always as “Judge Douglas” in reference to Douglas’s earlier title as a Justice on the Illinois Supreme Court) for Douglas’s hypocrisy on the issue. In the wake of Dred Scott Douglas was an enthusiastic supporter of the Court’s decision. Lincoln accused Douglas and Chief Justice Taney of, in Herbert’s words, “working, together with other Democrats, to extend and perpetuate slavery.” With the Dred Scott case decided and slavery now, supposedly, enshrined in the Constitution forever, Douglas wanted no one to tamper with it — much less try and undo it.
Read more at http://spectator.org/articles/63293/dred-scotting-religious-liberty

Whitehouse lights

confederate house

My oh my, doesn’t the White House look festive?

Demokrats 3

Morals

Wrong is wrong, even if everybody is wrong.