Leftist Mob Melts Down Over ‘Deport White Liberals’ Shirt at Anti-Trump Protest
Rancho Palos Verdes, California — March 28, 2026. So much for tolerant liberals. A pack of “No Kings” protesters swarmed a lone conservative man wearing a “Deport White Liberals” t-shirt outside Trump National Golf Club, screaming insults and demanding he leave because one guy with a different opinion somehow terrified them.
The video shows the man standing his ground calmly as dozens circle him, megaphones blaring and the crowd chanting nonstop. “Racist! Racist! Racist!” a woman shouts through the megaphone. “Go home! Go home!”
Protesters pile on with raw fury. “You’re a fucking racist!” one yells. “Racists go home! Racists go home!” the group chants in unison, whistles and noise filling the air. When the man quietly responds, “I’m not a racist,” they drown him out instantly: “Yes you are!” “Get the fuck out!” “Leave! Racist!”
The harassment continues for the full 40 seconds captured: “Racists go home!” repeated like a broken record, with extra jabs like “You’re scaring people!” thrown in. Police stand nearby watching but don’t step in as the mob presses close, all because one man dared show up with a shirt mocking their own hypocrisy.
This is the “resistance” in action — peaceful on paper, but a snarling intolerance fest up close. One guy outnumbered 50-to-1 triggers their full meltdown, proving once again that leftists love diversity of everything except thought. Free speech only applies when you agree with them. The rest get labeled, shouted down, and chased off.
I see people living as if they expect to live here forever, building, digging in, fortifyng themselves, perparing for many years, when, if the truth could be seen, a few short months are all that are left.
A story from an unnown source; a prosperous man was stricken by disease one day in his office. He was placed in the hospital, where there appeared before him a vision of a stranger, a stranger seemingly from another world. The stranger said, “I am Death, and I have come for you.” “Oh,” cried the ill man, “I am not prepared to die. I cannot die now! Give me one more chance. I promise to prepare for you, and to be ready the next time you call.” Strange to say, Death took him at his word and gave him another chance. He improved and was soon back in his office and at his work. Like hundreds before him, with the return of good health came the old habit of rejecting the Christ. He failed to keep his promise. A few weeks later he was again stricken with disease, and aain was placed in the ambulance and taken to the hospital, where he was the second time approached by the stranger. “I am Death,” said the stranger, “and I have come for you.” “But,” cried the patient, “I am not ready for you. I cannot die now. Give me one chance more. I promise to be properly ready next time you come.” But it was too late. Death had come this time to take him. Certainly Death is coming for us all. For a season we can stay the grim hand, but for a season only. All too soon he will come to call for us and will not be denied.
The next world is our forever home, choose carefully which it will be; the one with Jesus the Christ or the one without Him.
You’ve Been Played: Trump, Tucker, Iran… and the Hand of God For months, I’ve intentionally held back from weighing in too much on the growing wave of anti-Israel voices emerging from within parts of the American conservative and Christian world. Figures like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Nick Fuentes and others have been shaping a narrative that is influencing millions that can deeply impact the midterm elections. I held back because I believe something more important is needed from me. While others are doing a great job focusing on these rigid voices and the damage they are doing, I decided to focus on reality, on the trutth of what is happening here on the ground in Israel. I want people to understand that we are no longer the Jews of exile, defined by weakness and victimhood, and having to react to our haters. We are living a historic transformation. This war is changing us and the world. The Jewish people are back in our land, standing strong, fighting back, and winning, and changing the trajectory of 2,000 years of history. No longer a tiny nation needing the protection of the world, but the most trusted and powerful ally of the strongest Empire in the world, the United States of America under President Trump. But now, something has emerged regarding Tucker Carlson that cannot be ignored. The other week, Senator Ted Cruz went on record calling for Tucker Carlson’s foreign ties to be investigated. This wasn’t a vague political attack. Cruz laid out a series of concrete, documented concerns that demand attention. Carlson has reportedly purchased a home in Qatar. His video content has been aired on Iranian state television. The Iranian regime itself has encouraged its citizens to listen to him. And networks tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, an ideological parent of Hamas, have been actively distributing his content across social media. From there, Cruz raised deeper concerns, questions, not proven conclusions. He suggested the possibility that Carlson’s messaging could be financially influenced, pointing to Qatar’s long-documented strategy of investing billions into shaping Western institutions, discourse, and policy. He also highlighted something many have quietly noticed. The Tucker Carlson of today is not the same Tucker Carlson many conservatives once trusted from Fox News. Cruz himself described the new Carlson as a “dangerous demagogue,” warning that voices like his are contributing to rising Jew-hating antisemitism within the conservative movement. Something has shifted. The question is what? And then came the development that changes everything. Reports are now circulating of an extraordinary sequence involving Tucker Carlson, President Trump, and Iran. If even partially true, this moves beyond media controversy into the realm of high-level strategic deception. According to these reports, U.S. intelligence intercepted communications suggesting Carlson had been in contact with Iranian officials. President Trump, aware of this, allegedly made a calculated decision: invite Carlson to the White House and deliberately provide him with false information that he was not interested in going to war with Iran, knowing it would be passed on to Tehran. Iran, believing it had reliable insight from a close confidant of the President, concluded that the United States was not preparing for an attack. And then, when the operation began, they were caught off guard. Strategic targets were hit. The element of surprise was achieved. If this account is accurate, it would mean that Tucker Carlson became a conduit for disinformation used against one of the most dangerous regimes in the world. Now step back and look at the bigger picture. This is beyond geopolitics and beyond media. This is a multi-layered reality where information itself becomes a battlefield, where perception becomes a weapon, and where even flawed human channels can be used to shape outcomes. And if you zoom out even further, something else becomes clear. This feels familiar.
Hidden channels. Reversed expectations. Enemies convinced they are in control, only to be completely outmaneuvered. We’ve seen this story before. In the days of Purim, Haman believed he was orchestrating the destruction of the Jewish people. Everything seemed aligned in his favor. But beneath the surface, forces were at work he could not see. What appeared to be his victory became his downfall. What looked like chaos was, in truth, orchestration. And today, we are living through a reality that echoes that same pattern. People ask me if I believe we are witnessing miracles. The answer is yes. 100% yes! Not only in the missiles intercepted or the debris falling everyone, yet hardly causing fatalists and injuries they should, and not only in the battles won against a huge dangerous enemy. But in the timing. In the confusion of our enemies. In the alignment of events no strategist could fully design. If even part of this Trump-manipulating-Carlson story is true, then we are seeing something profound: a world where deception, misinformation, and Carlson’s human imperfection, is being turned into tools that ultimately defeat the evil Islamic regime of Iran that has been a dangerous threat to the Jewish state of Israel and the whole freedom loving world. To my friends in the American conservative and Christian world, this is a moment for clarity. Your support for Israel has been critical and deeply appreciated, especially against the growing damage from Tucker, Candece and Magen, sometimes in the name of Christianity. But we are living in a moment where not every voice in our camp claiming to speak truth is actually aligned with it, and not every bold or rebellious narrative is rooted in reality. We need your voices to reach your fellow conservatives and Christian’s to counter the lies in the name of Tucker’s “truth”. This is not a normal war. This is a battle over truth itself. Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Megyn Kelly are reaching millions of Americans with a dangerous distortion, that Israel or “the Zionists” control America, even implying that President Trump is somehow a puppet of the Jews. It’s an accusation so detached from reality that it collapses under its own weight. But here is the deeper truth. No leader is a puppet of the Jews. No nation is controlled the way these conspiracies suggest. If anything, the only “puppetry” that exists is something far greater, human beings, all of us, operating within a reality guided by God’s will, whether we recognize it or not. And that is why I don’t fear the rising wave of Jew-hatred being fueled by these narratives. Because even this, especially this, is part of a bigger story. A story pushing the Jewish people to step fully into our identity, not as victims reacting to hatred, but as victors embracing our responsibility. A responsibility to lead, to stand for truth, and to guide humanity toward a path of goodness, morality, and godliness emanating from Zion. The noise may grow louder. But so will the clarity of who we are and what we are here to do. The Jewish people are no longer passive in history. We are shaping it. We are no longer asking for protection, we are ensuring it. And as we do, there will be confusion, noise, and even influential voices that misunderstand what is unfolding, and turn against us. We are not just involved in a physical war, it is deeply spiritual. And there are voices within both Islam and Christianity that can not see the Jewish people as victors today, because our return to strength and sovereignty directly challenges deeply held theological assumptions, undermining, in many cases, the very foundations of their beliefs. But the direction is clear. We, the Jewish people back as sovereign in our ancestral homeland Israel, are moving forward, stronger, more rooted, and more aligned with our purpose than we have been in generations. Because in the end, this story is not about Tucker Carlson. It’s not even about President Donald Trump. It’s about something much bigger. It’s about a people returning home. A nation reclaiming its destiny. A story unfolding beyond politics and media cycles. A story of reversal. A story of survival. A story of victory. A story we have lived before. And are living once again. This time, the story moves toward a different ending, one in which we fulfill our national purpose across our Biblical homeland, strengthening a God infused society rooted in morality, responsibility, and a clear rejection of evil. From there, we rebuild our third Temple, elevate our spiritual center and deepen God’s presence in our land, becoming a source of light and clarity for all humanity to internalize and be uplifted by in these redemptive times. Remember: we are victors, not victims. Lift your eyes beyond the headlines and recognize the extraordinary moment we are living through. And if you’re not yet in Israel, what are you waiting for?
For those who are curious about the accuracy of or who buy into the statement that “God is Nonbinary”, I hope this helps. Then ask yourself, is this claim from a wolf in sheep clothing?
According to this claim, they cite Genesis 1:1-2 and argue the Hebrew term for God is maculine (ĕlōhîm) and Spirit is feminine (rûaḥ). Therefore, God is Nonbinary.
In Matthew 3:16, we read of the “Spirt of God” ascending upon Jesus. There, the Greek term for Spirit (pneuma) is neuter and God (theos) is masculine. Word gender in both cases, according to Bill Mounce, a leading Greek teacher, is simply grammatical and has no bearing on the gender of the entity. He states, “Hebrew and Greek words follow what is called “grammatical gender.” This means that the gender of the word is not determined by its meaning but by other things. For example, all nouns ending in ματ are neuter. Since πνευμα is from the root πνευματ, it is therefore neuter. But that says nothing about how the Greek understood the concept of God’s Spirit.”
To support this, look at John 15:26, “But when the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me.” This is Jesus speaking in the Upper Room Discourse to the 11 Apostles, Judas has left. Jesus refers to the Spirit (pneuma) as masculine. Anyone saying differently is, in essence, claiming to understand more than Jesus, and deceiving their audience.
Beware of false teachers! The warning we receive thoughout scripture from Peter (2 Peter 2:1), Paul (1 Tim 4:1), Matthew (Matt 24:11), Luke (Acts 20:29-30), Jeremiah (Jer 23:16), and many more.
Please share this if you care to speak against those who as Jeremiah states, “speak the vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD”.
History has a funny way of getting twisted by people who weren’t there to live it. The most dangerous distortions are the ones that have had centuries to fester. So lets take a look at the Danbury Baptists.
Picture Connecticut in October of 1801. The Congregational Church, the old Puritan establishment, is the official religion of the state, and it will remain so until 1818.
If you are a Baptist, a Methodist, or an Episcopalian, you must petition the local justice of the peace for a certificate to worship separately and that justice can refuse you.
Your taxes still flow to the Congregational coffers. You are, in every civic sense that matters, a second-class citizen.
The Danbury Baptist Association, representing twenty-six churches in western Connecticut, is living under this regime, and they’re getting nervous.
They aren’t sitting around worrying that the Church is going to take over the federal government. They are terrified that the government…state and, potentially, federal is going to crush their way of worship.
They needed to know that the heavy hand of the federal magistrate wasn’t coming for their altars.
So they write to President Thomas Jefferson and he writes back on January 1, 1802. He agrees with them and paraphrases the First Amendment, telling them that the American people had declared “that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’” thus building “a wall of separation between Church & State.”
—
Modern secularists love that phrase They’d hang it like a neon sign over every courthouse and school board meeting in America if they could.
But they have the nature of it completely backwards.
Jefferson wasn’t building a prison to keep God out of the public square. He was building a fortress to keep the State out of the sanctuary. It’s a shield for the Church, not a muzzle.
Now, the left will protest that this letter was no private musing, and on that narrow point, they are correct. Jefferson drafted his reply in consultation with two Cabinet members, Attorney General Levi Lincoln and Postmaster General Gideon Granger, and the letter was published in newspapers across the country.
He intended it to be a political statement. Fine. Lets take it as a political statement. What does it actually say? It says that the wall protects the citizen from the government.
Every clause in that letter places the restraint on the magistrate, not on the minister.
—
The First Amendment is a negative right. It doesn’t tell you what you can do; it tells the government what it can’t do. It’s a chain on the wrist of the State.
When the founders wrote those words, they were acknowledging that power seeks to devour, and the conscience must be guarded against the appetite of kings.
By twisting Jefferson’s letter to mean that religious expression must be scrubbed from public life, the modern Left is actually doing the very thing the Danbury Baptists feared…using the state to dictate the terms of our existence.
The Congregational establishment of Connecticut taxed dissenters and denied them full civic standing. Today the mechanism is different, cultural pressure, legal threats, and administrative exclusion…but the coercion is still the same.
—
For those of us walking the narrow path, this goes deeper than constitutional law.
We don’t demand religious liberty just because it’s written on parchment. We demand it because coerced faith is spiritually dead. God is the ultimate author of liberty. Go back to Genesis.
When God placed Adam in the Garden, He placed the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil right there in the middle. He didn’t put a high-voltage fence around it. He didn’t strip Adam of the ability to rebel.
If God wanted a world of automatons, He would have created robots, not people with the gift of free will and the dignity to choose. As it says in 2 Corinthians 3:17, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”
A government that tries to force religion… or force the absence of it… is acting against the nature of God Himself.
Any ruler who exceeds his mandate and reaches into the domain of the soul has ceased to govern and begun to tyrannize.
—
The wall exists to ensure that when we say “Yes” to God, it’s our own voice speaking.
It ensures that our worship is an offering and that we come to God as servants…not slaves
We fight for this wall not to hide from the world, but to keep the world from corrupting the sacred space where man meets his Maker.
We must tear down the myth and rebuild the wall as it was intended: a rampart against tyranny, ensuring that the State remains the servant…
Let’s settle something history already settled. You can debate theology. You can debate doctrine. But denying that Jesus of Nazareth walked this earth is not really a faith debate. It is a historical one. And historically speaking, Jesus is one of the most documented figures of the ancient world. Not just in the Bible. Outside of it.
Non Christian historians wrote about Jesus without trying to promote Christianity.
Tacitus was a Roman historian who wrote about Christus being executed under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Emperor Tiberius. Tacitus was not a believer. He actually viewed Christians negatively. Yet he still documented that Jesus was a real historical figure who was crucified.
Josephus was a Jewish historian who referenced James as the brother of Jesus who is called Christ. That is powerful because it is coming from a Jewish historical perspective, not Christian preaching.
Pliny the Younger wrote about early Christians worshipping Jesus as God. This shows that very early followers were not treating Jesus like just a teacher. They were treating Him as divine.
None of these men were trying to build Christianity. They were recording what they observed in their world.
Archaeology also lines up with the Gospel record. Evidence confirming Pontius Pilate as a real Roman governor was discovered. Evidence connected to Caiaphas the high priest was discovered. Even Nazareth, which critics once claimed was made up, has been confirmed as a real first century town.
The manuscript evidence for the New Testament is stronger than most ancient historical writings. The time gap between when events happened and when they were written down is much smaller than most ancient documents historians trust every day. Yet people rarely question those documents. They only question Scripture because of what it claims.
The Gospels were written close enough to the events that eyewitnesses were still alive. If Jesus was not real, the movement would have been crushed quickly. Instead, Christianity spread under intense persecution. People were beaten, imprisoned, and killed and still refused to deny what they said they saw. People might die for something they believe is true. They rarely die for something they know is a lie.
Then you have the prophetic layer. The Old Testament described details about the Messiah long before Jesus was born. Details about where He would be born. How He would suffer. How He would be rejected. How He would be pierced. These were written centuries before the crucifixion.
Serious historians are not really debating whether Jesus existed. The real debate is who He was. Because Jesus did not present Himself as just a good teacher. He claimed authority to forgive sins. He claimed unity with God. He predicted His death and resurrection.
You can reject church culture. You can reject organized religion. You can reject Christian doctrine.
But rejecting that Jesus lived requires ignoring Roman records, Jewish historians, archaeology, manuscript history, and early eyewitness testimony.
That is not blind faith. That is historical reality.
The real question was never whether Jesus existed.
The real question has always been what will you do with the fact that He did.
1:21 And they went into Capernaum; and straightway on the Sabbath day he entered into the synagogue, and taught.
1:22 And they were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one that had authority, and not as the scribes.
This verse does not start with Mark’s favored word of action because nearly a year in the ministry of Jesus was skipped. Matthew and Luke deal with that year. Perhaps Peter skipped it because he felt it could have bogged down the pace of his narrative by having to take time to explain to his readers that the rejection reflects our ability to choose to accept or reject Christ at this point in his account.
Part of what was happening with the teaching from Jesus was that He was teaching Scripture, not tradition of men; He was teaching them what God said, not what some famous Rabbi of bygone days had said. The Wesleyan quadrilateral is important but it must never be forgotten that the Scripture part of that is the preeminent portion, yet too many times tradition gets elevated above its proper place.
1:23 And there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit; and he cried out,
1:24 Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the Holy One of God.
1:25 And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him.
1:26 And when the unclean spirit had torn him, and cried with a loud voice, he came out of him.
1:27 And they were all amazed, insomuch that they questioned among themselves, saying, What thing is this? what new doctrine is this? for with authority commandeth he even the unclean spirits, and they do obey him.
1:28 And immediately his fame spread abroad throughout all the region round about Galilee.
The whole subject of demonology is a difficult one, but no more so than the problem of the devil. The devil is an unclean spirit, because he has lost all the purity of his former nature, therefore he acts in direct opposition to the Holy Spirit of God, and by his suggestions defiles the spirits of men. There are many in our assemblies who quietly attend under merely formal teachers; but if the Lord comes with faithful ministers and holy doctrine then by his convincing spirit, they are ready to say, like this man, What have we to do with thee! There is potentially a hint of dishonesty in what that demon said in that it probably was well aware of the fact that Jesus was born in Bethlehem and therefore it likely was attempting to cast doubt or deflect Jesus from what it feared Jesus might be about to command to happen.
No “disorder” could enable a man to know Jesus to be the Holy One of God. He desires to have nothing to do with Jesus, for he despairs of being saved by him, and dreads being destroyed by him. Consider whose language they speak, who say to the Almighty, “Depart from us”. This unclean spirit hated and dreaded Christ, because he knew him to be a Holy One; for the carnal mind is enmity against God, especially against his holiness. People who cannot stand to attend a Bible-believing/Bible-teaching Church here on earth should not expect to be able to tolerate Heaven.
When Christ by his grace delivers souls out of the hands of Satan, it is not without tumult in the soul; for that spiteful enemy will disquiet those whom he cannot destroy. This put all who saw it to considering, “What is this new doctrine?” A work as great often is accomplished now, yet men treat it with contempt and neglect. If this were not so, the conversion of a notorious wicked man to a sober, righteous, and godly life, by the preaching of a crucified Savior, should cause many to ask, “What doctrine is this?”
pastorwardclinton 