Beneath the dignity of the office – LOL

Democrats worship Presidents like Kennedy & Clinton who repeatedly committed adultery in the White House. They worship Obama, who used the IRS to harass & intimidate Conservative Americans.

But they’re horrified by a Trump tweet. It’s “beneath the dignity of the office,” they scream.

Sorry, hypocrites. I’m not buying it.

I’m more bothered by a President who gets a blow job in the Oval Office from a White House intern than I am by a President who tweets something to a member of the liberal media.

Grow up. – Joe Walsh

Well said, Joe, well said.

Fake Media Created James Hodgkinson

Democrat shooters

At the very least.

James Hodgkingon, the gunman who opened fire on 14 Jun ’17 on Republican Congressmen and staffers had declared on FB that “It’s time to destroy Trump and Co.”

the deranged base of the Democrat party is so full of hate and people like Bernie and Hillary and the CNN crew all fan the flames to keep their deluded base on the plantation.  We therefore have a clear example of the dangers that can transpire by the media pushing a false narrative.  This weak minded individual, James H., was so thoroughly brainwashed by the left-wing media outlets that he decided to take the lives of those he had been programmed to hate.  He parroted on his FB page many of the stories that have been clearly proven to be false, but they served to fuel his hate and prevent him from figuring out who the real oppressor was.

Democrat politicos have been calling for “blood in the streets” and now that they have got it they are suddenly pretending they didn’t really mean it.  They are only saying that at the moment because they fear a backlash that would remove them from their comfy positions of power.  In a few days they will likely return to their hate-filled rhetoric.  It took less than 24 hours for some in the left-wing “news” media to return to their lying propaganda.

Sadly, more than a few in the far left are calling James H. a “hero” which only proves how evil they truly are.  Decent people would at least pray for those injured but the rebid leftist’s hatred seems to stop at nothing.  The insanity and incitement to rage by the leftists must stop.  They are the true face of the Democrat part but the violence, mayhem, and discord of the Democrat Socialist party must be brought to an end for the sake of the society.

2nd Chronicles 7:14 –Pastor Ward Clinton

Progressive Democrat Fascist

Even the word “Communism,” which every revolutionary is so proud of, has been changed into “progressive, “anti-Fascist” or “liberal.” Further, to confuse their adversaries, the Marxist-Leninists have devised a new language which uses old words in the basic vocabulary. When they say “imperialism arouses the wrath of the people and digs its own grave,” they mean “through our manipulation of the local Communist parties, and with a vast auxiliary corps of dupes ; and sympathizers, we so arrange matters that the free enterprise system and democracy are destroyed from within. All we need to do is push it into the grave.”http://www.marianland.com/marx01.html

DemoKrats

Malcom X

In June of 1857, the year before he would challenge Illinois Democrat and incumbent Senator Stephen A. Douglas for a seat in the U.S. Senate, Abraham Lincoln addressed the subject of Dred Scott and whether decisions of the Supreme Court should be challenged. Lincoln, was, famously, a lawyer and a good one. He revered the law. And up until the Dred Scott decision, issued by the Court months earlier in March of 1857, Lincoln was unhesitating in his support of judicial decisions. But deliberately, willfully inserting slavery into the Constitution — not based on the law but on the pro-slavery sentiments of the Court’s members, notably including Chief Justice Roger Taney — was a bridge too far for Lincoln. In writing his opinion on the case Taney had quite specifically made his bias plain, saying that African-Americans “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

Lincoln biographer David Herbert Donald writes of Lincoln’s reaction this way:

“So blatant was the Chief Justice’s misreading of the law, so gross was his distortion of the documents fundamental to American liberty [meaning the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution], that Lincoln’s faith in an impartial, rational judiciary was shaken; never again did he give deference to the rulings of the Supreme Court.”

Not only was Lincoln done with his faith in giving “deference” to the idea of “an impartial, rational judiciary,” he used his speech to tear into Douglas (whom he refers to always as “Judge Douglas” in reference to Douglas’s earlier title as a Justice on the Illinois Supreme Court) for Douglas’s hypocrisy on the issue. In the wake of Dred Scott Douglas was an enthusiastic supporter of the Court’s decision. Lincoln accused Douglas and Chief Justice Taney of, in Herbert’s words, “working, together with other Democrats, to extend and perpetuate slavery.” With the Dred Scott case decided and slavery now, supposedly, enshrined in the Constitution forever, Douglas wanted no one to tamper with it — much less try and undo it.
Read more at http://spectator.org/articles/63293/dred-scotting-religious-liberty