For those who are curious about the accuracy of or who buy into the statement that “God is Nonbinary”, I hope this helps. Then ask yourself, is this claim from a wolf in sheep clothing?
According to this claim, they cite Genesis 1:1-2 and argue the Hebrew term for God is maculine (ĕlōhîm) and Spirit is feminine (rûaḥ). Therefore, God is Nonbinary.
In Matthew 3:16, we read of the “Spirt of God” ascending upon Jesus. There, the Greek term for Spirit (pneuma) is neuter and God (theos) is masculine. Word gender in both cases, according to Bill Mounce, a leading Greek teacher, is simply grammatical and has no bearing on the gender of the entity. He states, “Hebrew and Greek words follow what is called “grammatical gender.” This means that the gender of the word is not determined by its meaning but by other things. For example, all nouns ending in ματ are neuter. Since πνευμα is from the root πνευματ, it is therefore neuter. But that says nothing about how the Greek understood the concept of God’s Spirit.”
To support this, look at John 15:26, “But when the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me.” This is Jesus speaking in the Upper Room Discourse to the 11 Apostles, Judas has left. Jesus refers to the Spirit (pneuma) as masculine. Anyone saying differently is, in essence, claiming to understand more than Jesus, and deceiving their audience.
Beware of false teachers! The warning we receive thoughout scripture from Peter (2 Peter 2:1), Paul (1 Tim 4:1), Matthew (Matt 24:11), Luke (Acts 20:29-30), Jeremiah (Jer 23:16), and many more.
Please share this if you care to speak against those who as Jeremiah states, “speak the vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD”.
He’s the person that Jesus warned us about he will appear as an angel of light. This guy is pure evil, and the Democrats are so morally bankrupt. They can’t see it.
Talarico says USA should have a giant welcome mat for illegal immigrants NO! it should not! That would be the death of America, unfortunately the Democrats would celebrate that.
🚨 BREAKING: Hakeem Jeffries just admitted Democrats are willing to keep the Department of Homeland Security shut down because they’re terrified ICE might be near polling places during the November elections.
Think about what that admission really means. Instead of focusing on security, border enforcement, or keeping critical agencies running, the priority suddenly becomes making sure immigration enforcement stays far away from the voting process.
The obvious question Americans are asking now is simple. Why would ICE presence be such a problem unless someone expects illegal activity to be happening in the first place?
Shutting down DHS over that fear tells the country exactly where their priorities are.
People act like the U.S. and Israel just woke up and decided to attack Iran for no reason. That’s not reality.
For years, Iran has funded and armed groups attacking both countries, pushed its missile program, and moved closer to nuclear capability. When a regime openly calls for Israel’s destruction & threatens U.S. interests in the region, that’s not something you just ignore and hope works itself out.
This isn’t about starting a war, it’s about stopping a bigger one later. If you believe Iran getting nuclear weapons would destabilize the entire region and put millions at risk, then taking action before that happens makes sense. Not to mention the sheer evilness of slaughtering 30,000 innocent Iranian civilians.
You don’t have to like it, Trump or Netanyahu, but pretending there’s no justification at all ignores the bigger picture.
Dr. Houman David Hammati has seen ALL of Iran and now? He writes…
🇮🇷 47 years ago, I stood at a window in Tehran as a 3-year-old boy, smelling burning tires and hearing the chants that would steal my country. I didn’t have words for what was happening. Today, I am watching smoke rise over the same city — but this time the smoke is not the end of Iran. It is, God willing, the beginning of her resurrection.
Several weeks ago I wrote in that the fever of 1979 was finally breaking. I never imagined I would wake up to see that fever confronted so directly. Israel — with the clear support of the United States — has launched a preemptive strike deep into Tehran and against the regime’s military machinery. Explosions in the capital. Military targets hit. The IRGC’s aura of invincibility, already cracked, is shattering in real time.
I do not celebrate war. No decent person does. What I celebrate — what millions of Iranians inside the country and in the diaspora have prayed for in secret for decades — is the possibility that a regime which has no right to exist may finally be forced to go.
This is the same regime that: – Armed and cheered the October 7 massacre against Israel for no reason other than pure genocidal hatred. – Murdered tens of thousands of its own sons and daughters who dared to walk peacefully in the streets demanding the most basic freedoms. – Gouges out the eyes of young women for the “crime” of wearing makeup. – Hangs teenagers from cranes for posting a tweet. – Exports terror, poverty, and darkness to every corner it can reach including the U.S.
No nation, no people, should have to live under that. Not Israelis. Not Americans. Not Lebanese. Not Syrians. And certainly not Iranians.
I am a physician who has spent his life trying to heal bodies and a son of Iran who has spent his life mourning a stolen homeland. What we are witnessing is not aggression — it is surgery. Painful, necessary surgery to remove a tumor that has metastasized for 47 years. The tumor is the Islamic Republic that has hijacked Iran.
To the brave pilots and special operators of the Israeli Air Force and the men and women of the United States military now carrying out this mission: I pray for you with everything I have.
May God shield you from harm. May every missile find its target and every soldier return home safely to the families who love them. You are not invaders. You are the answer to the prayers of millions who have whispered “enough” in the dark since 1979. You are giving our friends the chance to breathe free air again. The entire region will owe you a peace we have not known in my lifetime.
To my fellow Iranians watching from inside the country right now, heart pounding, maybe hiding in basements or on rooftops: Hold on. The end is clearer than it has ever been. The regime’s fear is real. Their eyes — those same eyes that once stared down at us with absolute power — now show something they haven’t shown in decades: panic. The math has changed. The window of 1979 is finally closing.
To the little three-year-old boy I once was — and to every little boy and girl in Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz, and Tabriz today who hears explosions instead of lullabies: This time the sounds are not the closing of a door. They are the opening of one.
The road ahead will not be easy. Transitions never are. But the direction is unmistakable. A secular, prosperous, free Iran is no longer a dream — it is becoming an inevitability.
I have lived the stolen life so that others might not have to. Today, for the first time in 47 years, I allow myself to believe that the stealing is almost over.
Thank you, Israel. Thank you, America. The Iranian people — the real Iran — will never forget.
The fever is breaking. The dawn of 2026 is here. And this time, the light wins.
Yes, Rep. Lawler’s post is largely accurate on the War Powers Resolution: President must notify Congress within 48 hours of hostilities, forces terminate after 60 days (+30 extension) unless Congress authorizes via declaration of war or statute (AUMF). Presidents have broad Article II authority for limited actions like strikes; Congress can force withdrawal via resolution anytime.
Korea: Truman called it a UN “police action” (no declaration); Congress funded it.
Vietnam: 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave statutory authorization (broad enough for escalation).
War on Terror: 2001 AUMF (statutory) authorized force against 9/11 perpetrators and associates—used for 20+ years as Congress didn’t revoke it.
Formal declarations ended after WWII; statutes/AUMFs became the norm instead, with politics preventing strict 60-day enforcement.
This conga line of feckless and leftwing Democrats on TV is grotesque. They are literally angry that our country is engaged in a righteous battle to eliminate a terrorist regime that is developing nukes, slaughtering tens of thousands, has murdered and maimed thousands of our fellow Americans, and is funding and spreading terrorism throughout the world.
Now, what did they do about this regime? Funded it. Appeased it. And left it to President Trump to deal with the disastrous mess they created and left him. They had no rational or effect strategy or plan to address it.
The Democrat Party does, in fact, hate America. Even now, at a time like this, they seek to sabotage us.
Also, a number of the usual American-hating Islamist media clowns are in full propaganda mode, trashing our president and our country. It is time to deport as many of them as is legally allowable and to attempt to denaturalize some of the others and remove them. When you read what they say and believe you have to wonder how an immigration system that is supposed to work to benefit our country, and is supposed to only allow in foreigners who have allegiance to our country, it is clear these individuals ought not be here. This is not about the 1st amendment or any civil liberties. It is about their presence in our country in violation of basic immigration-law requirements.
Since many of my Democrat colleagues don’t seem to understand the War Powers Act, it’s very simple:
The President must notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops or commencing an attack. The President must then withdraw troops within 60-90 days, unless Congress declares war.
In this instance, Congress was notified in advance and briefed before the strike on Iran. A full classified briefing will be forthcoming.
Now, Congress can pass a concurrent resolution ordering the troops be withdrawn at anytime, which is what Massie and Khanna are trying to do.
But under Article II and as Commander in Chief, the President has the authority to act. The notion that this strike is illegal or that the President needed Congress’ authority is wrong.
.
Furthermore, Biden and Obama conducted numerous strikes in numerous countries without Congress and none of the people screaming now, seemed to have any objections.
For historical context, Congress has not declared war since WWII. – Mike Lawler @Lawler4ny
I got a message today from a rando telling me she felt sorry for me if I thought the SOTU was a win. Since I had already posted a favorable take, I suppose I’m the grateful recipient of her unsolicited concern. She wrote:
“The dems were boycotting Trump and his lies! All he did last night was bully the dems and complain about former policies and presidents! That’s all he ever does! Ridicule and divide and if you think that shitshow last night was a win, then I feel sorry for you! WTF IS HIS PLAN TO SUPPORT AMERICANS GOING FORWARD! Crickets! He has no plan except continue lying about the evil dems, immigrants, woman and past presidents! Give me a break!”
Setting aside the emotional punctuation, let’s unpack this.
First, the Democrats weren’t “boycotting lies.” They were boycotting the speech. In a representative republic, boycotting is a coward’s move. You show up. You listen. You rebut. You don’t take your ball and go home because you dislike the speaker. What they staged was performative protest—tailor-made for social media clips. It was so comically ineffective, I almost felt sorry for them.
Almost.
Second, on bullying, ridicule and division, Democrats tried to remove Trump from the ballot, bankrupt his businesses, imprison him, and casually labelled him and his family Nazis, racists, and dictators. Since 2016, that has been the Democratic playbook—all while elements of their coalition aligned with Jew-hating pro-Hamas demonstrators, defended illegal immigration as a moral imperative, and treated American sovereignty as something faintly embarrassing. If ridicule has infected the bloodstream of American politics, it did not originate with a Trump punch line.
On immigration, the administration is not targeting immigrants—it is detaining and deporting illegal immigrants. That distinction matters in a nation built on laws. The stray reference to “woman”? I assume that is meant to suggest misogyny or some Epstein-adjacent smear. There is zero evidence for that—actually the opposite—but in modern politics, accusation is often treated as conviction.
They say you can judge a man by his enemies. On that measure alone, Trump is doing just fine.
Now to the “no plan” accusation.
This is the standard progressive critique: if you’re not cutting a check, you’re not governing. Democrat presidents have perfected that model—stimulus payments, expanded entitlements, loan forgiveness schemes, and trillion-dollar spending packages that create the appearance of compassion while quietly expanding debt and dependency.
Strategy, however, is not about immediate gratification. It is about structure.
There have already been measurable shifts: reductions in federal employment rolls, a serious effort to close the border and accelerate deportations, billions identified in waste and fraud, a middle-class tax cut delivered by a GOP Congress, and inflation trending back toward the two-percent range. None of that makes for dramatic cable-news monologues, but it represents real movement.
Step back and consider the broader landscape. America endured five years of extraordinary economic damage. Democrat-led states shut down large portions of the economy during COVID, fracturing supply chains and distorting labor markets. Then came years of Biden-era spending that pushed inflation to levels not seen in decades, and the largest influx of illegal immigrants in our history through what amounted to a de facto open border. Billions in taxpayer dollars were redirected toward housing, benefits, and healthcare for individuals never authorized to be here.
Simultaneously, we endured an ideological war on domestic energy—pipeline cancellations, lease suspensions, regulatory chokeholds—while mandating green energy products manufactured largely in China. We were outsourcing both our energy independence and our industrial future, congratulating ourselves for virtue while hollowing out our capacity.
These are real structural issues.
Imagine your car has four flat tires. You replace them and feel productive. But your engine is seized because you ignored the warning light and never changed the oil. You can admire your new tires all day—you’re still not going anywhere. The engine is the real issue, and it’s expensive to fix.
And here we are.
The Trump administration is focused on the engine: restoring supply chains, expanding domestic energy production, confronting healthcare cost distortions, rooting out entitlement fraud, curbing illegal immigration, restraining inflationary spending, and recalibrating foreign policy to reduce endless conflicts that disrupt trade and empower adversaries. There is also a deliberate effort to peel Western Hemisphere partners away from Chinese and Russian influence, reorienting economic and security relationships back toward the United States.
Those initiatives are systemic and strategic. They cannot be solved in a single speech or a single fiscal year. So, when someone shouts “crickets,” what they often mean is, “I do not see an immediate personal benefit.”
You may dislike Trump’s tone. You may hate his delivery. You may bristle at his instinct for ridicule, but to claim there is no plan requires either ignorance or willful blindness. It is not that he is doing nothing. It is that he is doing everything at once—repairing structural damage accumulated over decades.
If that looks like chaos, perhaps it is because some people truly just prefer the comforting 𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 of motion.
pastorwardclinton 