The hatred they’ve been spewing created this mess.
It is dumbfounding to live in a country where building a border wall seems to be immoral and yet killing babies is not a big deal.
The Democrats’ revulsion regarding Donald Trump’s proposal to resettle illegals in sanctuary cities is indicative of their NIMBY attitude–not in my back yard. They want open borders but are unwilling to accept the consequences of open borders in their OWN communities! Let them in but make them live somewhere other than where my constituents live. They want to have their cake and eat it too! The problems they create are always left for someone else to fix, like kicking a can down the road. And what’s down the road? The taxpayers pick up the tab for the next clean-up job.
Think about this…..🚨JACK SMITH WAS SECRETLY COLLECTING $5 MILLION A YEAR FROM GEORGE SOROS WHILE DRAWING A FEDERAL SALARY — NICK SHIRLEY JUST EXPOSED IT!
The special counsel was serving two masters the entire time.
A private investigation into Jack Smith’s finances has uncovered something sinister: while he was drawing a $215,000 salary from the U.S. Treasury as a federal prosecutor, bank records from the Virgin Islands show he was also collecting another $5 million a year from none other than George Soros.
The information comes straight from Nick Shirley and his team — so the link is rock solid.
Smith wasn’t just a prosecutor. He was a paid operative.
It’s time for both of them to find out.
Share this everywhere so America finally sees who was really funding the witch hunt!
James Talarico has stated “I always think of myself as a Christian who hates Christianity” According to the Scripture he is anathema.
Talarico has made it clear that he want the southern border to have a “giant welcome mat.”
There is a legal way to enter this country and any who refuse to come in the proper way, have no business being in this country.
Unfortunately, Talarico and many of his Democrat compadres aren’t just after political power. They’re out to completely destroy the traditons and values we hold dear, which includes liberty.
The creator of the illustration above got it pretty accurate with one little unintentional flaw. I’m quite sure Inequality was supposed to be “Their money should be yours” in the liberal thought process. – A mere typo on that board, otherwise, they nailed it!
One man awake, awakens the rest…be that person. – pastorwardclinton.com
The cartoon says out loud what a lot of Americans already suspect. The anchor looks into the camera and says “without evidence,” while a mountain of it sits right there behind him.
Here is what actually happened this week. President Trump gave a primetime address on election security. He released newly declassified documents and pointed to China’s access to voter data, weaknesses in our voting systems, and names on the rolls that should not be there.
And how did three of the biggest networks respond? ABC, NBC, and CNN would not carry the speech live on their main networks. They streamed it off to the side, then came back later to tell you what to think about it.
Sit with that for a second. A sitting President addresses the nation on a national security matter, and the people who claim to be democracy’s last line of defense would rather run a game show.
You do not hide something from your audience when you are confident they will agree with you. You hide it when you are afraid of what they might conclude on their own.
The “without evidence” stamp has become a reflex. It gets slapped on a story before anyone in the newsroom has read a single page. That is not journalism, that is note-taking for one political party.
Meanwhile, what most voters actually want is simple. Poll after poll shows broad support for voter ID, across every group. The SAVE Act just asks for proof of citizenship to register. That is not extreme. In most of the world, that is called Tuesday.
So the real question is not whether every claim the President made is airtight. The real question is why the people paid to inform you worked so hard to keep you from hearing him at all.
Nice advice.
Dear socialists,
When you get a minute, and that shouldn’t be hard considering most of you don’t have jobs, pop in to South Florida and find a Cuban cafe. Make sure to tell everyone there sipping their coffee how great socialism is.
Let us know how it goes.
Thanks!
Here is a fun little puzzle for anyone who says the left is all about diversity and lifting up immigrants.
Elon Musk just became the first person in history to reach a net worth of one trillion dollars. He was born in Pretoria, South Africa. He came to America the legal way, earned his citizenship in 2002, and built companies that put rockets in orbit and electric cars in millions of driveways.
By any honest reading of the words, he is an African who became an American. A self-made immigrant success story.
So where are the celebrations from the people who say they love immigrants and worship green energy?
Nowhere to be found.
Here is the part that makes you laugh out loud. Not long ago, that same crowd adored this man. Tesla was the official car of the climate movement. Democrats made up about 40 percent of Tesla buyers. They parked his cars in their driveways like a badge of honor.
Then Musk did the unforgivable. He started thinking for himself. He questioned the spending, the censorship, and the narrative. He stopped voting the way they told him to.
And just like that, the hero became the villain.
The cars they once bragged about got bumper stickers that read, I bought this before Elon went crazy. The man they praised became, in their own words, public enemy number one.
Nothing about Musk changed except his politics. Same immigrant. Same companies. Same electric cars they used to love.
That is the tell. The applause was never about the achievement. It was about obedience.
We have always believed people should be judged by their work and their character, not by whether they fall in line. Musk earned every dollar of his success. The only thing he refused to do was bow.
And for that, the love turned to hate overnight.
Pastorwardclinton.com
This political cartoon really sums it up.
For years, Democrats and their left-wing allies have acted as if basic economics can be bullied into submission with a slogan, a protest sign, and a government mandate.
They demanded higher wages for entry-level fast food jobs, not because every franchise owner suddenly had extra money lying around, but because it sounded good politically.
And that is always the problem.
It sounds compassionate. It sounds fair. It sounds like standing up for the little guy.
Then reality shows up.
A few years ago, the big rallying cry was the $15 minimum wage. Democrats treated it like some magical solution that would lift everyone up with no downside, no trade-offs, and no consequences.
Then the kiosks arrived.
Now, as the push gets even more aggressive, franchise owners and fast food chains are doing exactly what any rational business would do when labor costs are pushed beyond what the business model can absorb.
They are replacing people with machines.
Not because they are evil. Not because they hate workers. Because they have to survive.
A self-service kiosk does not call in sick. A robot arm does not demand overtime. An ordering screen does not trigger payroll taxes, benefits, scheduling headaches, or lawsuits.
That is the part the left never wants to talk about.
When politicians force costs higher, businesses adapt. Sometimes they raise prices. Sometimes they cut hours. Sometimes they close locations. And sometimes, they automate the very jobs Democrats claimed they were trying to protect.
The sad irony is that the people cheering the loudest for these policies are often the same people hurt first when the entry-level ladder gets pulled away.
Maybe leftists should think things through before taking action that makes their own lives worse.
Good intentions do not repeal economics. They just make the consequences more expensive.
After all, folks:
“Unfortunately, the real minimum wage is always zero, regardless of the laws, and that is the wage that many workers receive in the wake of the creation or escalation of a government-mandated minimum wage, because they lose their jobs or fail to find jobs when they enter the labor force. Making it illegal to pay less than a given amount does not make a worker’s productivity worth that amount—and, if it is not, that worker is unlikely to be employed.”
― Thomas Sowell, Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy
pastorwardclinton 