Professing Themselves to be Wise, They Became Fools

This is so incredibly ridiculous that it almost reads like parody.

The WNBA is the Women’s National Basketball Association. The entire point of the league is that it exists for women. Yet the league is now holding discussions over transgender eligibility while saying there are “no immediate eligibility matters” and denouncing what it calls “bad-faith efforts” around the issue. The league’s own collective bargaining agreement says only women are eligible to play, but reporting on the controversy notes that it does not define the term.

How did women’s professional basketball get to the point where “who is a woman?” requires meetings, task forces and corporate language?

This is also a breathtaking missed opportunity.

Caitlin Clark helped bring enormous attention to the league. The WNBA itself called 2024 a record-setting season, with its highest attendance in 22 years, record television audiences, record merchandise sales, and a single-season attendance record for the Indiana Fever. Clark’s rookie season was at the center of that explosion in interest.

The league had momentum. It had new fans. It had people watching women’s basketball who had never cared before.

Instead of protecting that opportunity, WNBA leadership and some of its coaches have allowed the league to become a progressive political shitshow.

Then came the Sophie Cunningham incident. Chicago’s DiJonai Carrington struck Cunningham in the head and neck, the foul was reviewed and upgraded to a Flagrant 2 because officials found windup, impact and follow-through. Carrington, who is Black, later posted “WHITE PRIVILEGE” and tagged the Fever, although she later said she was not claiming the foul call itself was white privilege.

And somehow the conversation again became about rhetoric, divisiveness and everyone’s feelings instead of simply defending the women who are supposed to be the reason this league exists.

Now former NBA players are making a mockery of the eligibility loophole just to force the question the WNBA should have answered immediately.

Biological women. Period.

Democrat Socialism

The Democrats really just want to burn down the American Republic so they can rule over the ashes.  Either patriots stand up now or we lose it forever.

The “Entitled” Generation

If they don’t break free from their indoctrination, life will become very difficult for them, very difficult indeed.

Islamists and Democrat Party

A lot of that listed above is also why I don’t care for the Democrat Party leadership.

Liberal Logic or lack thereof

Sen. John Fetterman tells Zohran Mamdani to “fix a pothole,” blasting the NYC mayoral candidate for weighing in on foreign policy:

“Now you have the mayor of a city. You’re a mayor, dude. You’re a mayor. You can fix a pothole. You can take out the trash. But you can’t order people to arrest anybody any more than I could. I couldn’t have him arrested if he came to Pennsylvania. It’s a joke, and he’s a clown. He also said that Netanyahu is not welcome in New York. You can’t say that any more than I can say, ‘Mayor, you’re not welcome in Pennsylvania.’ So sit down. I know you’re a clown, and you’re just going to pander to the fringe because that’s part of your base. I know you’re angry at Netanyahu because he killed a lot of people you admire, whether it’s Sinwar, Nasrallah, or Qaani in Iran. He’ll only criticize the prime minister of Israel, but he never criticizes Hamas. He never criticizes Hezbollah or Iran. I’ve never heard the mayor condemn Iran for killing 30,000 or 40,000 of its own young people who were simply asking for democracy in their country.”

The Lesson of the Screw

Why has the mainstream media NEVER told you this? The Democratic Socialists of America recently voted in support of completely DISMANTLING the American Republic and replacing it with a new system.

Their national political committee voted 12 to 11 in support of ABOLISHING the Presidency and the Supreme Court and making everything completely subordinate to Congress. Look at how many of them have run for Congress lately! What are the odds?

Over 51% of the DSA’s governing board members are now self-avowed communists. And they recently passed 120,000 members, making them the largest “socialist” organization in American history. Ten years ago, that number was only 6,000.

The mask is fully off. The radicals are actively infiltrating the Democratic system to execute this blueprint from the inside out. Look at Mamdani and the slate of radicals winning primaries and trying to seize real political power. They are systematically replacing traditional Democrats with radical collectivists who are openly telling you, in their own published platform documents, that they want to dismantle the American Republic and destroy the separation of powers. The facade is gone. This IS the communist blueprint for a silent takeover.

It is a dismantling of our great nation.   We must wakeup and turn back to the right, the righteous path.   Pastorwardclinton.com

Dark Ages?

The phrase is repeated so often it has hardened into certainty. The Dark Ages, we are told, began when the Roman Empire collapsed and Christianity smothered the light of classical civilization. Science vanished. Learning died. Europe stumbled blindly through a thousand years of superstition until the Renaissance finally rescued reason from the grip of priests.

It is a tidy story. It is also wrong.

When the Western Roman Empire collapsed in the fifth century, the disaster was not theological—it was civilizational. Cities emptied. Trade routes collapsed. Roads crumbled. Literacy declined. Political authority fractured into a patchwork of Germanic kingdoms that possessed neither the administrative machinery nor the cultural inheritance of Rome.

The darkness that followed did not descend because monks burned books. It descended because the world that produced those books had collapsed.

And yet, in the wreckage of that fallen order, something remarkable happened. In lonely valleys and along forested hillsides, small communities of Christian monks began doing something that no conquering army, no new king, and no collapsing city seemed interested in doing: they preserved the memory of the ancient world.

Inside monastic scriptoria, by candlelight and patient discipline, monks copied manuscripts—line by line, page by page. They copied the Scriptures, of course. But they also copied Virgil, Cicero, Ovid, Livy, and countless other works of classical antiquity. Without those quiet labors, much of what we know about Greece and Rome might simply have vanished.

The men doing this work were not secular humanists ahead of their time. They were Christians. They believed that truth, wherever it appeared, ultimately belonged to God. Preserving learning was not rebellion against faith. It was an act of devotion.

Monasteries became islands of stability in a turbulent world. They cultivated fields, organized communities, and preserved literacy at a moment when most of Europe had forgotten how to read. Their libraries became reservoirs of memory while kingdoms rose and fell around them.

Over time those small islands of learning began to connect. By the eleventh and twelfth centuries a new intellectual revival was underway. Cathedral schools evolved into institutions dedicated entirely to scholarship. These institutions would soon receive a new name—universities.

The University of Bologna, Paris, and Oxford did not emerge in defiance of the Church. They were born inside it. Theology stood beside law, medicine, and philosophy as part of a unified search for truth. Scholars argued fiercely over Aristotle, debated logic, experimented with natural philosophy, and tried to reconcile reason with revelation.

The medieval world was not anti-intellectual. It was intensely intellectual. Figures like Thomas Aquinas, Albertus Magnus, and Roger Bacon wrestled with the newly rediscovered works of Aristotle and the expanding body of knowledge flowing from the Islamic world. They did not treat faith and reason as enemies. They believed both ultimately pointed toward the same reality.

Even the foundations of what would later become modern science were quietly forming during these centuries. Medieval thinkers developed the idea that nature operated according to rational laws because it had been created by a rational God. If the universe was ordered rather than chaotic, then studying it was not impiety—it was a form of worship.

The irony is striking. The very civilization accused of plunging Europe into darkness built the intellectual institutions that would eventually illuminate it.

None of this means the medieval world was idyllic. It was violent, unequal, and often brutal. Wars were frequent. Plagues were devastating. Superstition and ignorance certainly existed. But these were not the unique failings of Christianity. They were the universal conditions of premodern life.

What Christianity provided was something different: continuity.

While political power fractured and empires dissolved, the Church preserved a transnational network of literacy, scholarship, and moral authority that stretched across Europe. Monasteries safeguarded texts. Universities trained scholars. Cathedrals became centers of art, architecture, and education.

The world that later produced the Renaissance did not emerge from a thousand years of darkness. It emerged from a civilization that had spent centuries preserving the light.

History rarely fits into the neat morality plays modern culture prefers. The medieval centuries were neither a golden age nor a pit of ignorance. They were something far more interesting: a long and difficult bridge between the ancient world and the modern one. And if we insist on calling them “dark,” we should remember who it was that kept the lamps burning.

Democrat Terms

The creator of the illustration above got it pretty accurate with one little unintentional flaw.  I’m quite sure Inequality was supposed to be “Their money should be yours” in the liberal thought process. – A mere typo on that board, otherwise, they nailed it!

One man awake, awakens the rest…be that person. – pastorwardclinton.com