This goes beyond endangerment. This is social engineering! Schools receive tax $ so children receive an education in history, math, literature enabling them to one day become discerning adults who think for themselves. No school should inculcate political bias – that’s exactly what the Nazi’s did!
Schools won’t allow your child to attend the most benign field trip without a sign parental authorization, yet they took children to a protest where tear gas grenades and non-lethal ammunition is fired at protesters.
This is criminal!
I guess y’all don’t remember Joy Reid proudly proclaiming that our children need to be “reprogrammed“! And that is now exactly what the so-called teachers union is attempting to do. And they are getting away with it. Stand up and fight for your kids.
First they take over the minds of our children, then they take over our country. People, this is the pattern of something malicious and dark! Remember Nazi Germany? Subversion started with children. Take back our children and you take back our country!
Parents in every city and state, must organize and start to take action, via parents and parental groups, consulting with totally honest attorneys, about the legal rights of parents to take civil or criminal lawsuits against school boards, schools, teachers, and teachers m’ unions, for proselytizing their children into political and religious belief systems. Simple but powerful.
One-world-government and communist entities for very lengthy time periods, have sought to gain control of our nation by gaining control of our children, mentally and emotionally; and politically and religiously. Generations of the deceivers’ seeds, have been sown under the auspices of teaching our children in only the basic knowldge and laws of our society approved by citizens and parents. But many teaching entities have been taught and trained to use basic, common education as a mere tool to accomplish their conttol of a nation.
These perpetrators have received some complaints by parents, but only when they receive severe legal punishments that cost them dearly for their wrongs and damages against us, and our precious children, will we be successful in protecting and providing for our children.
History has a funny way of getting twisted by people who weren’t there to live it. The most dangerous distortions are the ones that have had centuries to fester. So lets take a look at the Danbury Baptists.
Picture Connecticut in October of 1801. The Congregational Church, the old Puritan establishment, is the official religion of the state, and it will remain so until 1818.
If you are a Baptist, a Methodist, or an Episcopalian, you must petition the local justice of the peace for a certificate to worship separately and that justice can refuse you.
Your taxes still flow to the Congregational coffers. You are, in every civic sense that matters, a second-class citizen.
The Danbury Baptist Association, representing twenty-six churches in western Connecticut, is living under this regime, and they’re getting nervous.
They aren’t sitting around worrying that the Church is going to take over the federal government. They are terrified that the government…state and, potentially, federal is going to crush their way of worship.
They needed to know that the heavy hand of the federal magistrate wasn’t coming for their altars.
So they write to President Thomas Jefferson and he writes back on January 1, 1802. He agrees with them and paraphrases the First Amendment, telling them that the American people had declared “that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’” thus building “a wall of separation between Church & State.”
—
Modern secularists love that phrase They’d hang it like a neon sign over every courthouse and school board meeting in America if they could.
But they have the nature of it completely backwards.
Jefferson wasn’t building a prison to keep God out of the public square. He was building a fortress to keep the State out of the sanctuary. It’s a shield for the Church, not a muzzle.
Now, the left will protest that this letter was no private musing, and on that narrow point, they are correct. Jefferson drafted his reply in consultation with two Cabinet members, Attorney General Levi Lincoln and Postmaster General Gideon Granger, and the letter was published in newspapers across the country.
He intended it to be a political statement. Fine. Lets take it as a political statement. What does it actually say? It says that the wall protects the citizen from the government.
Every clause in that letter places the restraint on the magistrate, not on the minister.
—
The First Amendment is a negative right. It doesn’t tell you what you can do; it tells the government what it can’t do. It’s a chain on the wrist of the State.
When the founders wrote those words, they were acknowledging that power seeks to devour, and the conscience must be guarded against the appetite of kings.
By twisting Jefferson’s letter to mean that religious expression must be scrubbed from public life, the modern Left is actually doing the very thing the Danbury Baptists feared…using the state to dictate the terms of our existence.
The Congregational establishment of Connecticut taxed dissenters and denied them full civic standing. Today the mechanism is different, cultural pressure, legal threats, and administrative exclusion…but the coercion is still the same.
—
For those of us walking the narrow path, this goes deeper than constitutional law.
We don’t demand religious liberty just because it’s written on parchment. We demand it because coerced faith is spiritually dead. God is the ultimate author of liberty. Go back to Genesis.
When God placed Adam in the Garden, He placed the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil right there in the middle. He didn’t put a high-voltage fence around it. He didn’t strip Adam of the ability to rebel.
If God wanted a world of automatons, He would have created robots, not people with the gift of free will and the dignity to choose. As it says in 2 Corinthians 3:17, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”
A government that tries to force religion… or force the absence of it… is acting against the nature of God Himself.
Any ruler who exceeds his mandate and reaches into the domain of the soul has ceased to govern and begun to tyrannize.
—
The wall exists to ensure that when we say “Yes” to God, it’s our own voice speaking.
It ensures that our worship is an offering and that we come to God as servants…not slaves
We fight for this wall not to hide from the world, but to keep the world from corrupting the sacred space where man meets his Maker.
We must tear down the myth and rebuild the wall as it was intended: a rampart against tyranny, ensuring that the State remains the servant…
Yes, it does tell me everything I need to know about the Democrat party, but if we control the house, the Senate in the Congress and the United States Supreme Court why doesn’t he stop the payroll tax today?
Oh, wait … The Senate has a rule of 60 votes to close debate on a bill right now to get to 60 you need the opposition members to vote to do that.
Pretti brought a Sig p320 to a protest. A firearm with a demonstrated history of discharging accidentally even with the safety set. He brought it to threaten officers. The previous week he was recorded in a display of violence that causes damage to an ICE vehicle. He isn’t a victim of anything but the consequences of his own behavior.
Wait, did hell freeze over or did John just realize you need an ID to buy a pack of gum but apparently ‘suppressing’ people to ask for one to pick the Leader of the Free World was too much? 🤨 Welcome to the party, Fetterman. We’ve been waiting for you to catch up since 2012. Now do us a favor and tell the rest of your caucus that common sense isn’t a ‘threat to democracy’—it’s just a driver’s license. Can’t wait for the hoodie with ‘I ❤️ Voter ID’ on the front. 🐘🇺🇸
Remarkable, but not surprising. Democrats never take personal responsibility. They cherry pick the laws they like, ignore the ones they don’t, then cry foul when consequences arrive as they try to shift the blame. Don Lemon didn’t stumble into this situation. He marched straight into it; he’s made it clear enough over time that he hates Christian values and morals. He clearly violated the First Amendment he now is attempting to claim as a shield and ran headfirst into the FACE Act. Calling yourself a journalist isn’t a hall pass. It doesn’t exempt you from the law, and it doesn’t turn participation into reporting. There were 40 people involved in storming that Church and terrorizing the children, the very people whom Democrats falsely claim to care about.
There are no kings in this country. No special classes. No sacred cows, except for the Democrat’s unholy sacrament of abortion. There is the Constitution and the laws Congress passed. You don’t get to follow the ones that serve you and disregard the ones that don’t. If the laws are wrong, elect people to change them. Until then, everyone plays by the same rules. Lemon isn’t a victim. He’s complicit. And pretending otherwise is exactly how Democrats keep breaking the system while blaming everyone else for the damage they’ve caused.