Blood Libel

The Blood Libel of Greater Israel

By Yehuda Meitav

There’s a new lie in town—an old hatred dressed in modern slogans. They call it the “Greater Israel” conspiracy, as if the Jews, having finally returned to their tiny sliver of homeland, are now plotting to conquer the region and beyond. But this accusation, like so many before it, is not about truth. It’s about projection. It’s about deflection. It’s about taking the darkest ambitions of the accuser and blaming the accused.

Let me say it simply: we are a small people, with a small country, and we’re happy with both. We never asked for empires. We don’t dream of conquest. We don’t want to rule anyone, and we’ve never asked to be bigger than what we are. The truth is, we’ve given up more land than we’ve taken. In 1979, we returned the entire Sinai Desert—over 60,000 square kilometers—to Egypt as part of the Camp David Accords, in exchange for a peace treaty that Egypt still honors to this day.

We withdrew unilaterally from Gaza in 2005—destroying 21 thriving Jewish communities and evacuating over 8,000 Israeli civilians—just to give the Palestinians a chance to build something of their own. And what did we get in return? Rockets. Terror tunnels. More hatred.

Again and again, we’ve made offers—at Camp David in 2000, at Taba in 2001, under Ehud Olmert in 2008—offering nearly 95% of the West Bank and even parts of East Jerusalem. And each time, the answer was no. Not because the borders weren’t right, but because Israel existed at all. Because behind the slogans of “occupation” and “apartheid” lies a more sinister truth: they don’t want a Palestinian state next to Israel—they want it instead of Israel.

The accusation of “Greater Israel” is not just false—it’s laughable. It has no roots in Israeli policy, no expression in Israeli society, and no support from Israeli citizens. What it does have is a long shadow of antisemitism—the same kind that once said Jews poison wells, control banks, spread disease. Today they say we want to conquer the world. Tomorrow, who knows?

But if you want to talk about expansionist dreams, look elsewhere. Look into the ideology of the Caliphate—an actual, openly stated goal in many streams of Islamic thought. Look at Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb—the world of Islam and the world of war. Look at the Islamic conquests that began in the 7th century and spread across the Middle East, North Africa, Spain, Persia, and parts of Europe. Look at the modern expressions: ISIS declaring a caliphate in 2014, the Muslim Brotherhood’s founding goal of global Islamic rule, and Hamas—whose charter still calls for the total destruction of Israel.

Read Hamas’s founding charter, Article 7: “The Day of Judgment will not come until Muslims fight the Jews and kill them.” That’s not fringe. That’s their constitution.

So let’s be honest: those who accuse us of imperialism are doing so to hide their own. The fantasy of “Greater Israel” is nothing but a mirror—reflecting back the ambitions of those who seek to dominate, not us. Because it’s not Jews who seek to expand—it’s those who cannot tolerate our existence.

We are not looking for more land. We are looking for more light. We don’t want your cities, your countries, your religions. We only want to live in peace in the only place we’ve ever truly called home. And even then—even in that tiny home—we’ve always been willing to share.

Because the truth is: we don’t need anything else. We have our land. We have our God. We have our Torah. That is enough.

And maybe that’s what scares them most—that a people who’ve been beaten, expelled, exiled, and burned still carry something they cannot destroy: a light that doesn’t want to conquer, only to shine.

So the next time someone tells you Israel dreams of taking over the Middle East, ask them this: who’s really dreaming of empire? And why are they so afraid of a people who only ever wanted to go home?

🔎 Sources for Verification:
1. Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty, 1979 – U.S. Department of State archives and Knesset records.
2. Israeli Disengagement from Gaza, 2005 – Knesset.gov.il, IDF withdrawal plans.
3. Camp David Summit, 2000 – U.S. State Department & Clinton Library notes.
4. Taba Talks, 2001 – European Union mediation documentation.
5. Olmert Peace Proposal, 2008 – Public interviews with Mahmoud Abbas (e.g., The Washington Post, 2009).
6. Hamas Charter (1988) – Article 7, accessible via the Avalon Project at Yale or official Hamas archives.
7. Islamic Expansion History – Encyclopaedia Britannica: Islamic world – The rise of Islamic empires and states.
8. Caliphate and Dar al-Harb concepts – Quranic interpretation studies and Islamic jurisprudence (e.g., Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s writings).

The Greatest Nation on Earth

JFK’S Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, was in France in the early 60’s when DeGaulle decided to pull out of NATO. DeGaulle said he wanted all US military out of France as soon as possible. Rusk responded, “Does that include those who are buried here?”

DeGaulle did not respond. You could have heard a pin drop.

When in England, at a fairly large conference, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if our plans for Iraq were just an example of ’empire building’ by George Bush. He answered by saying, “Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those who did not return.”

You could have heard a pin drop.

There was a conference in France where a number of international engineers were taking part, including French and American. During a break, one of the French engineers came back into the room saying, “Have you heard the latest dumb stunt Bush has done? He has sent an aircraft carrier to Indonesia to help the tsunami victims. What does he intend to do, bomb them?” A Boeing engineer stood up and replied quietly: “Our carriers have three hospitals on board that can treat several hundred people; they are nuclear powered and can supply emergency electrical power to shore facilities; they have three cafeterias with the capacity to feed 3,000 people three meals a day, they can produce several thousand gallons of fresh water from sea water each day, and they carry half a dozen helicopters for use in transporting victims and injured to and from their flight deck. We have eleven such ships. How many does France have?”

You could have heard a pin drop.

A U.S. Navy admiral was attending a naval conference that included admirals from the U.S., English, Canadian, Australian, and French navies at a cocktail reception. He found himself standing with a large group of officers that included personnel from most of those countries. Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks when a French admiral suddenly complained that, whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English. He then asked, “Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?” Without hesitating, the American admiral replied, “Maybe it’s because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies, and Americans arranged it so you wouldn’t have to speak German.”

You could have heard a pin drop.

AND THIS STORY FITS RIGHT IN WITH THE ABOVE…

Robert Whiting, an elderly gentleman of 83, arrived in Paris by plane. At French customs, he took a few minutes to locate his passport in his carry on. “You have been to France before, monsieur?” the customs officer asked sarcastically. Mr. Whiting admitted that he had been to France previously. “Then you should know enough to have your passport ready.” The American said, “The last time I was here, I didn’t have to show it.” “Impossible. Americans always have to show their passports on arrival in France!” The American senior gave the Frenchman a long hard look. Then he quietly explained, ”Well, when I came ashore at Omaha Beach on D-Day in 1944 to help liberate this country, I couldn’t find a single Frenchmen to show a passport to.”

You could have heard a pin drop.

I am proud to be an American, and proud of this God given heritage!

Democrats Have to Cheat to Win

Democrats constantly cheat.

Democrat plantation

Liberalism wants a world where your identity as male or female is a “social construct” rather than a matter of biology, DNA, and pre-determind selection. Even though it is stated in Genesis that “HE CREATED THEM BOTH MALE AND FEMALE”. But liberalism wants to remove the “creator” component. They hate the very idea of “natural law”. So their Utopia? Remove the God of creation .. Now you can be your own God and “create yourselves” into whatever image you like. And since you are not created in “His Image” you don’t need Him nor His instructions. All you really need is big government as your “source”. This is the religion and gospel of elite liberalism.

Facts Regarding Democrats

They are still the same people, no change, just more subtle.

Vote

Vote like your future depends on it — because it does.

The Social Security thing

HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.

Up until the 1980’s, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.

Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION” message was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.

Deep State Exposure

Just research the stuff folks, it’s not that hard…. It all makes sense now!!A must read….This is why I don’t believe in coincidences anymore!!Wow!!“Things you must know to be informed…YES, THE GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN USED TO WORK FOR GEORGE SOROS.*YES, CALIF GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM IS NANCY PELOSI’S NEPHEW YES, ADAM SHIFF’S SISTER IS MARRIED TO […]

Deep State Exposure